Visualizzazione post con etichetta safeguarding the environment. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta safeguarding the environment. Mostra tutti i post

giovedì 14 aprile 2011

Save Anzio's shore, and the rest of Italy too....

Dear English-speaking friends, first of all, I’m sorry we’ve neglected you… those of you who’ve been following us since November are probably wondering what happened to us since I haven’t translated any of our articles during the past months. You probably thought: “are they dead or what?” Nope, we’re not dead, but the stretch of coast right is front of Anzio, where we live, is. They’re killing it. Every day, since February, one piece at a time. But let’s go back to the very beginning. 


In February, in Anzio, which is a town on the coast of Lazio, near Rome, public works for the protection against coastal erosion started.  The coast of Anzio certainly needed some kind of intervention in this sense, so what’s the problem? The problem’s the solution they’ve found to the coastal erosion issue. Basically, they’re building a sort of Chinese wall!!! 

Click on the photo to enlarge....
When we realized that the works were starting, we decided to see what they were doing and managed to find the relevant coastal erosion plan. And what we found out was shocking!!  The plan envisages building 15 100-meter-long stone groynes (and this wouldn’t actually be that bad) which are all connected together by a 4.5 kilometer long, 10 meter wide underwater stone barrier (and this is bad!!!) . This barrier is going to be only 50 cm. below mean sea level,  which means that a person standing on it would be in shin-high water.  Since this barrier is going to be 10 meters wide and made up of huge stones and rocks, which will probably be full of seaweed and very slippery in no time, it will be impossible to cross.  The other point that I’d like to stress is that this barrier is going to be 4.5 km. long!!!!!! The whole stretch of coast of Anzio.  There will be a 200 meter distance between the 15  groynes and the plan envisages building 100 meter x 200 meter cells, as they call ‘em.  Surfing’s going  to be impossible.  


But that’s not the only drawback: even swimming will be a problem and this plan also poses great risks not only to swimmers, kids etc. but also in terms of safety. Lifeguards will find it very hard to rescue someone from drowning.  The barrier will entail poor water quality (and marine pollution), thus greatly impacting tourism. And, despite what many may think, it won’t help replenish our narrow beaches. But the fact is that all these issues, all these problems (including safety, tourism, environmental impact, beach replenishment, etc.) are not taken into account. At all. The only variable the plan considers is coastal erosion. Nothing else.  The plan is by ARDIS, the Regional Territory Defense Agency, and the funds are of the Lazio Region.  The construction works are divided into three parts, each envisaging building 5 groynes in a 1.5 km long stretch of sea.  Works for building the first 5 groynes and the first 1.5 km long barrier started in February.  Since then, Green Ocean Surfing, together with other local surfing associations, have been fighting this, in every possible way. 


All our articles have been dedicated to this one and only  massive and urgent problem. WE’VE GOT TO STOP THEM!!!!!  We tried talking to the Mayor of Anzio and the local public administration to make them realize that building a “Chinese wall” in a town that lives on tourism and on the sea is insane. We tried to convince them that the underwater barrier will pose risks to swimmers, boats (stricken boats will have no possibility to be rescued or to reach shore), etc. and to ask the Regional administration to modify the plan so as to only build the 15 groynes. We asked an engineer and a marine biologist to study the problem and write a technical report. Together with other local associations, we managed to draw the interest of the media, and on Monday morning, April 11,  a TV show talked about the issue. But it’s not enough!!! We’ve got  to find a way to stop them. We’re not saying that nothing should be done to protect the coast from sea erosion, but there are other ways, other eco-friendly methods that do not have such a great environmental impact. But, of course, these are not even considered as feasible solutions. 


We just wanted to update you on the issue which, even though is a local problem, might interest you, since solutions like this are adopted across Italy and all around the world. We’ll keep you informed, but if you have any ideas as to what might be done to fight this insane plan or if you have any information that you want to share with us about other interventions of this kind that have been undertaken in your city or town, please write to us and let us know.  

 STOP IT!!!!

mercoledì 5 gennaio 2011

SHARK el Sheik or a huge pool without sharks?




Since the July 2005 terrorist attacks, the quiet tourist destination of Sharm el Sheikh, on the Red Sea, had not attracted so much interest from the media worldwide. During the past few weeks, the media have started talking more and more about Sharm. Once again, it’s due to unpleasant facts: a series of unprecedented incidents, actually. No bombs this time, but a shark that bit several swimmers.
Journalists and TV news, not seeming to care much about providing accurate information to their public, and seeming more interested in the sensationalism of a shark biting humans, even said that a great white shark is terrorizing Sharm. Too bad that great whites, i.e. Carcharodon carcharias, live for the most part in cold waters and, so far, have never been spotted in the Red Sea.

But let’s have a look at what happened in chronological order.
October 20: Sharm Club village. First encounter with an adult oceanic white tip shark, i.e. Carcharodon longimanus, which was seen and photographed near shore.

First encounter _ Photo by OnlyOne ApneaCenter
An eye witness said that a woman who was swimming near the floating jetty had started screaming. From shore, it looked like the swimmer’s fins were set wide apart emerging above the water. But in reality the swimmer was not wearing any fins or mask. The fins that the lady onshore had seen were the dorsal and caudal fin of an oceanic white tip shark. Fortunately, the victim was only slightly injured and just needed a few stitches; however, she certainly got a nice scare; the circular injury inflicted by the shark was probably due to chafing by its rough skin, rather than to a shark bite. We must say, however, that it wasn’t the first time that an oceanic white tip shark had been seen roaming curiously in the area close to the dive platform used by free divers for training, but it had never come so close to swimmers before.
Not to create panic, the accident wasn’t disclosed, even though in Sharm rumors spread fast and word got around anyway.

November 30, more than a month later: 3 swimmers were bitten by a shark on the same day. The authorities blamed a single adult oceanic white tip shark about 8 ft. long, which had been photographed by a scuba diver at the Coral Bay resort.  

White tip shark responsible for the Coral Bay attack; it has a semi-circular scar (apparently due to a bite) on its caudal fin_Photo by Fabio Casarotti
All the incidents took place in an area along the coast from the Coral Bay Resort, where a Russian woman was bit, to the tip of Ras Nasrani, an area of approximately 10 km.




In these incidents, 3 Russian tourists, 2 men and a woman, were seriously injured and rushed to hospital in Cairo.     
At this point, Egyptian authorities, in a panic, decided to take measures, since they were facing an unprecedented situation.
December 1: all beaches were closed and all water sports activities, including scuba diving and snorkeling were suspended everywhere, except in the area of the Ras Mohamed marine park. During the night, the shark hunt began. Boats from the marine park chummed the water, i.e. threw huge amounts of blood and cut up fish meat in the water to attract sharks. Official sources reported that 2 sharks were killed, a mako shark and an oceanic white tip, which were immediately blamed for the incidents.



However, a couple of days after the autopsy, the authorities revealed that the two sharks were innocent. They were killed for no reason.
December 4: beaches were reopened, after a series of check dives were conducted to make sure the area was safe. 
December 5: an elderly German woman was bitten by an oceanic white tip shark while she was swimming off the Hyatt Hotel. She suffered serious injuries and died. Eye witnesses reported that, before the incident, some tourists had thrown food in the water, attracting a multitude of coral reef fish to take some pictures. Feeding fish is prohibited everywhere in the Red Sea, but unfortunately people often don’t abide by this rule. Some hotels even give their guests “fish bags”, i.e. bags of leftover food to feed the fish. Before feeding fish, though, it would be wise to think that small fish attract big fish. It’s a law of nature.   
Glass bottom boats usually throw food in the water to attract a multitude of colorful fish for the tourists to marvel at. Nobody does anything to stop them, however, so as not to spoil their questionable business.

On the same day, December 5, all beaches are once again closed. Diving, snorkeling activities and water sports are banned. Several internationally acclaimed shark experts are invited to Sharm to investigate the causes of the atypical behavior of the shark or sharks involved in the incidents.
8-28 December: diving, snorkeling activities, and water sports are allowed provided that a series of safety rules are complied with, following the advice of the team of shark experts.
There is talk of installing shark nets to protect hotel beaches, but this is only possible on shallow and sandy bottoms, without current. The maximum depth of the Red Sea is 2600 meters, the currents are often very strong, and close to shore there are reefs that from the surface plunge straight down hundreds of meters. Then there is talk of erecting watch towers on all the hotel beaches, and lastly of creating a system of buoys emitting electromagnetic signals capable of keeping sharks and rays away from the coast where the hotels are located. If this were the case, the entire coast of Sharm would become a huge swimming pool without sharks or rays. Wouldn’t it be easier to educate tourists entering the water to respect the marine environment and its rules?

Ten years ago, Sharm was mainly a place for divers, who for the most part, are used to respecting the marine environment where they dive.
Today, Sharm is a place for mass tourism. It’s a cheap destination, and ever-growing numbers of people come here for a week’s holiday without having a clue about the fragile marine ecosystem of the Red Sea, nor about the damage that their ignorance causes.  To please the tourist market, is it then more desirable to turn the Red Sea into a gigantic open-air aquarium? So it seems.
Non-official sources report that the shark hunt did not end with the killing of the 2 sharks at the beginning of December, but that at present at least 8 sharks of different species have been killed, including a nurse shark, which is not considered even potentially dangerous to humans. Why?
The HEPCA, Hurghada Environmental Protection and Conservation Association, condemns without reserve the indiscriminate killing of sharks in Sharm el Sheikh. Since 2006, Egyptian law prohibits the capture, killing, and sale of sharks. Fishing is also prohibited, except for set periods of time and outside national parks. Unfortunately, it’s becoming more and more common to see small fishing boats stealing away from dive sites at the break of dawn, after a night of illegal fishing. Year after year, diving in Sharm, it’s easy to see the consequences of over-fishing: there is less and less fish in the water. 
A senior official of the South Sinai Protectorate, who is also a marine biologist, defended the SSP from the accusations of HEPCA describing the indiscriminate killing of sharks as a scientifically recognized shark assessment. This “assessment” involves the examination of shark innards, and therefore the killing of all captured specimens. The brilliant biologist, after examining shark innards for little over a week, came to a ridiculous conclusion: in the Red Sea, there would be a “surplus” of sharks. At the global level, many species of shark are endangered, and some even risk extinction. Those who have dived in Sharm know that it is not common or easy to encounter these wonderful creatures underwater, so the question that comes to mind is: how can anyone state that there is a “surplus” of sharks in Sharm?

What were the causes of this atypical behavior of sharks? Let’s start with saying that no shark willingly attacks a human being. Sharks do not eat people. Our meat doesn’t taste good to a shark. If a shark bites, it’s a way of understanding what we are. In fact, if a shark happens to bite a person, it bites and then releases. Sharks don’t eat people, because we’re not its usual preys. All incidents are caused by erroneous human behaviors, often unintentional. When we enter the water, we cross the threshold of a world that is not our own; the possibility of encountering a shark is remote, but it exists. It is our responsibility to understand how to interact with these creatures, that have been the ocean’s top predators for millions of years. We can’t simply chase them away from their natural habitat.

The major cause of the incidents that happened in Sharm is now well known, and it is, as usual, an example of erroneous human behavior. At the end of November, after the Eid, the Muslim sacrifice feast, the crew of a cargo ship threw overboard over a thousand carcasses of sheep, thinking that they would sink. Instead, the carcasses became bloated with water and started floating on the surface of the sea, carried by currents.
Sheep carcass… apparently, a cargo ship threw overboard hundreds of carcasses after the Eid, the Muslim sacrifice feast… it seems like this attracted the sharks…

Sharks are the garbage collectors of the sea, and were attracted by the decaying carcasses. Currents then brought the carcasses and the sharks close to the coast. An excessive abundance of food in the water can also bring about a behavior that in ecology is called “feeding frenzy”, which, as the name suggests, causes predators, such as sharks, to go wild and bite anything within biting range, including other sharks or a person that happens to come between the shark and its food. This is a perfectly understandable behavior. Why, then, the sea and its creatures have to pay for a human mistake?

Curious facts about sharks:
-Among the over 500 species of sharks known to man, only 4 are considered potentially dangerous for man: the great white shark, the oceanic white tip, the tiger shark, and the Zambezi shark, or bull shark.
- A shark only eats 1 and a half kilos of fish 3 times a week.
- How dangerous are sharks? 100 million to 1, this is the ratio of shark/man deaths in 2007; this means that for every man killed by a shark, there are 100 million sharks killed by man.

To know more about these wonderful predators of the sea, to learn how to behave if you happen to interact with them, take a few minutes to watch this amazing video: it makes one think. Enjoy it!  





P.S. Good news: The Governor of South Sinai, on January 2, 2011, stated that he did not agree to install an electromagnetic shield to protect the beaches from sharks as there is no scientific proof that shows that this device actually works. A big thank you from the Red Sea sharks!

Article by: Barbara Ferri 


Barbara Ferri is a pisces, the daughter of a Navy officer and a globetrotter. She arrived in Sharm El Sheikh in 1999 where, bewitched by its underwater beauties, she still lives, dedicating her life to underwater filming. She graduated in creative writing and is a writer.  

www.greenoceansurfing.com


giovedì 18 novembre 2010

Green products




Green products

Green Ocean Surfing is not the only one interested in ecology and safeguarding the environment. All the major surfing brands (West, Rip Curl, Body Glove, Patagonia, Billabong etc.) are increasingly investing in research and are expanding their lines of “green” products, ranging from wetsuits to surf wear to lycras. And all the best pros in the world have also promoted and shown interest in green products: Mick Fanning surfed in Rip Curl’s green wetsuit during the Billabong Pro Mundaka in 2009 to raise awareness of environmental issues.  Rip Curl Planet Foundation, which was launched in 2008, is working to fight pollution and safeguard the ocean and surf spots worldwide by funding environmental projects.
But let’s take a quick look at some of these green products. West’s Eco-lycra is derived from bamboo, grown without the use of pesticides and fertilizers, and recycled plastic bottles, while Rip Curl has undertaken its neoprene recycling project since Spring '08 and its green wetsuit features a new neoprene that uses non-solvent glues in the lamination process, resulting in a major reduction of chemicals polluting the air. Patagonia uses limestone-based polychloroprene for most of its neoprene products to reduce dependence on oil and oil-derived chemicals and uses recycled polyester and chlorine-free wool in the lining to reduce environmental impact. Body Glove features its bamboo charcoal lycra, Eco gloves and wetsuits made of non-toxic stretch material and environmentally friendly non-petroleum Bio-Stretch rubber using organic and non-toxic water based inks; it even features eco bamboo skimboards! Billabong also features eco wetsuits: 90% recycled polyester and water based inks.
Here is an overview of some of these eco products, for you to check out and compare!  And remember: always choose an eco-friendly product!!!!!!!!!!! 



West Lycra
West’s Eco-lycra, derived from bamboo and recycled plastic bottles provides a superior quality fabric while conserving the earth’s valuable resources. Quickly renewable bamboo grows easily, the pulp is bleached without chlorine and is easy to dye, lessening the environmental impact from clothing production. This, combined with recycled plastic bottles brings a soft, durable fabric so you can maximize your surfing time, while doing your bit for the planet.

Source: http://westsurfing.com/wetsuits/lycra


Rip Curl – Green products

Project Resurrection

Rip Curl was proud to announce in Spring '08 the success of our neoprene recycling project. Never again would this material - so valuable to surfers in cold waters - be treated as trash! Project Resurrection can now save old wetsuits and production off-cuts from a gruesome end (burial or incineration), by offering worn neoprene a second life: reincarnation as a footwear outsole.
 

Solvent-Free Glues... The Green Wetsuit

Mick Fanning was seen at the Rip Curl Pro Search in Portugal in 2009 wearing a green wetsuit. He did so to get the message out, as he had been joining forces with Australia's Enviroweek.

The green Rip Curl wetsuit features a new neoprene that uses non-solvent glues in the lamination process, resulting in a major reduction of chemicals polluting the air. Approximately 800 tonnes of solvents currently evaporate into the air because of current neoprene laminating processes, so this development will be a huge improvement for the environment and will also benefit worker health.

"Wherever we can we are looking for ways to reduce any impact on the environment that our products may have," said Mick Ray, Rip Curl Global Wetsuit Chairman. "The laminating process has always been a particularly toxic one so this initiative of using non solvent based glues is going to be massive in terms of improving working conditions in the factories as well as reducing the amount of nasty pollutants in our air."

Eco Design In Our Products

Products wearing the Rip Curl Planet label are made with at least 55% eco-friendly fabrics like organic cotton, recycled fibres or other eco-friendly fabrics like linen or hemp. Want to know more about these fabrics?

 

Organic Cotton

Conventional cotton farming uses a lot of insecticides and pesticides. It can take as much as 17 teaspoons of toxic chemicals to grow the cotton needed to make one T-shirt. These toxic chemicals are harmful to farmers, they pollute soils, rivers and oceans.

Organic cotton is grown without chemicals. We are using more and more organic cotton for T-shirts and fleeces, but also in denims, dresses, shirts, caps, bags. 

Recycled Fibres

Recycling saves natural resources and produces less trash. We use recycled plastic bottles and polyester to make boardshorts, bikinis, bags and mountainwear. We use recycled neoprene to make footwear outsoles, and we use recycled wool and cotton to make jumpers and fleeces.

Other Eco-Friendly Fabrics

  • Hemp, ramie, nettle and linen fibres: they're all made from plants that need very little farming (water, fertilisers, pesticides) and grow pretty much by themselves.
  • Lyocell: a textile fibre made from wood pulp, like viscose, but with an eco-friendly process.



Body Glove's Eco Mission

Smarter, Greener, Cleaner

Body Glove loves water. We love the oceans, the rivers, the lakes, the snow, the streams and the rain that allow us to enjoy the surfing and diving lifestyle. When you love something you want to do what you can to protect, preserve and enhance that love. We know that as humans and as a company who manufacturer products that we are far from perfect. With our Eco iniative we plan to outline how we (and you) can help protect, preserve and enhance what we love. 

Five Fingers of Body Glove's Eco Mission

  1. Mission Statement: Body Glove will strive to follow the lead of our environmentally conscious founders and continue to support local and international environmental organizations while also leading the way in product development and corporate responsibility. Our mission is to be smarter, greener, cleaner.
  2. Products: Body Glove will continue to expand the Eco line of products. The Eco product series goal is to incorporate, wherever reasonably possible, renewable, recycled, sustainable and/or organic materials to produce unique and high performance product.
  3. History: Body Glove will celebrate and continue to highlight Bill and Bob Meistrell's history of environmental action.
  4. Organizations We Support: Body Glove will continue to support local and international environmental organizations such as Reef Check, Surfrider Foundation, and Heal the Bay.
  5. Take Action: Words can only do so much We are taking action and encouraging you to take action.

www.greenoceansurfing.com